Never Enjoy Life Again After Opiate Addiction
Sci Pract Perspect. 2002 Jul; ane(one): 13–20.
The Neurobiology of Opioid Dependence: Implications for Handling
Thomas R. Kosten
1 Yale University Schoolhouse of Medicine New Oasis, Connecticut
ii VA Connecticut Healthcare Organization West Haven, Connecticut
Tony P. George
one Yale University Schoolhouse of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut
3 Connecticut Mental Health Center New Haven, Connecticut
Abstract
Opioid tolerance, dependence, and habit are all manifestations of brain changes resulting from chronic opioid abuse. The opioid abuser'due south struggle for recovery is in nifty part a struggle to overcome the effects of these changes. Medications such as methadone, LAAM, buprenorphine, and naltrexone human activity on the same brain structures and processes as addictive opioids, just with protective or normalizing effects. Despite the effectiveness of medications, they must be used in conjunction with appropriate psychosocial treatments.
While the individual patient, rather than his or her disease, is the appropriate focus of treatment for opioid abuse, an understanding of the neurobiology of dependence and addiction tin can be invaluable to the clinician. It can provide insight most patient behaviors and problems, help ascertain realistic expectations, and analyze the rationales for treatment methods and goals. Too, patients who are informed about the brain origins of addiction tin benefit from understanding that their illness has a biological basis and does not mean they are "bad" people.
Encephalon abnormalities resulting from chronic employ of heroin, oxycodone, and other morphine-derived drugs are underlying causes of opioid dependence (the need to go on taking drugs to avoid a withdrawal syndrome) and habit (intense drug craving and compulsive use). The abnormalities that produce dependence, well understood by science, announced to resolve after detoxification, within days or weeks later on opioid use stops. The abnormalities that produce addiction, nevertheless, are more wide-ranging, complex, and long-lasting. They may involve an interaction of environmental effects—for example, stress, the social context of initial opiate use, and psychological workout—and a genetic predisposition in the class of brain pathways that were abnormal fifty-fifty before the first dose of opioid was taken. Such abnormalities can produce craving that leads to relapse months or years after the individual is no longer opioid dependent.
In this commodity nosotros draw how opioids affect brain processes to produce drug liking, tolerance, dependence, and addiction. While these processes, similar everything else that happens in the encephalon, are highly complex, we endeavor to explain them in terms that can be easily understood and explained to patients. We also discuss the treatment implications of these concepts. Pharmacological therapy with methadone, LAAM (levoalpha-acetylmethadol), naltrexone, or other medications straight offsets or reverses some of the brain changes associated with addiction, greatly enhancing the effectiveness of behavioral therapies. Although researchers do not withal know everything about how these medications piece of work, it is clear that they are all truly agile treatments, rather than simply substitutes for the addictive opioids.
ORIGINS OF DRUG LIKING
Many factors, both private and environmental, influence whether a item person who experiments with opioid drugs will continue taking them long enough to become dependent or addicted. For individuals who practice continue, the opioids' ability to provide intense feelings of pleasance is a disquisitional reason.
When heroin, oxycodone, or whatsoever other opiate travels through the bloodstream to the brain, the chemicals attach to specialized proteins, called mu opioid receptors, on the surfaces of opiate-sensitive neurons (encephalon cells). The linkage of these chemicals with the receptors triggers the aforementioned biochemical brain processes that advantage people with feelings of pleasance when they engage in activities that promote bones life functions, such as eating and sex. Opioids are prescribed therapeutically to relieve pain, but when opioids activate these reward processes in the absenteeism of pregnant hurting, they tin motivate repeated use of the drug but for pleasure.
One of the brain circuits that is activated past opioids is the mesolimbic (midbrain) reward organization. This organization generates signals in a role of the brain called the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that result in the release of the chemical dopamine (DA) in another part of the brain, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) (Figure i). This release of DA into the NAc causes feelings of pleasure. Other areas of the brain create a lasting record or memory that associates these expert feelings with the circumstances and environment in which they occur. These memories, called conditioned associations, often lead to the craving for drugs when the abuser reen-counters those persons, places, or things, and they drive abusers to seek out more drugs in spite of many obstacles.
The Mesolimbic Reward Organization
When drugs stimulate mu opioid receptors in the encephalon, cells in the ventral tegmental expanse (VTA) produce dopamine and release it into the nucleus accumbens (NAc), giving ascension to feelings of pleasure. Feedback from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to the VTA helps the states overcome drives to obtain pleasure through deportment that may be unsafe or unwise, but this feedback appears to be compromised in individuals who get addicted to drugs. The locus ceruleus (LC) is an area of the brain that plays an important part in drug dependence.
Particularly in the early on stages of abuse, the opioid's stimulation of the brain'due south advantage system is a primary reason that some people take drugs repeatedly. Nonetheless, the compulsion to use opioids builds over time to extend across a unproblematic bulldoze for pleasure. This increased compulsion is related to tolerance and dependence.
OPIOID TOLERANCE, DEPENDENCE, AND WITHDRAWAL
From a clinical standpoint, opioid withdrawal is 1 of the about powerful factors driving opioid dependence and addictive behaviors. Treatment of the patient's withdrawal symptoms is based on understanding how withdrawal is related to the brain's adjustment to opioids.
Repeated exposure to escalating dosages of opioids alters the brain and so that information technology functions more or less commonly when the drugs are present and abnormally when they are not. Two clinically important results of this amending are opioid tolerance (the demand to take higher and college dosages of drugs to achieve the same opioid consequence) and drug dependence (susceptibility to withdrawal symptoms). Withdrawal symptoms occur but in patients who have adult tolerance.
Opioid tolerance occurs because the brain cells that take opioid receptors on them gradually become less responsive to the opioid stimulation. For example, more opioid is needed to stimulate the VTA encephalon cells of the mesolimbic reward organization to release the same amount of DA in the NAc. Therefore, more opioid is needed to produce pleasure comparable to that provided in previous drug-taking episodes.
Opioid dependence and some of the nigh distressing opioid withdrawal symptoms stem from changes in another important brain system, involving an area at the base of the encephalon—the locus ceruleus (LC) (Figure 2). Neurons in the LC produce a chemical, noradrenaline (NA), and distribute it to other parts of the brain where information technology stimulates wakefulness, animate, blood pressure, and general alertness, among other functions. When opioid molecules link to mu receptors on brain cells in the LC, they suppress the neurons' release of NA, resulting in drowsiness, slowed respiration, low blood force per unit area—familiar effects of opioid intoxication. With repeated exposure to opioids, however, the LC neurons adjust past increasing their level of action. At present, when opioids are present, their suppressive touch is commencement by this heightened action, with the result that roughly normal amounts of NA are released and the patient feels more than or less normal. When opioids are non nowadays to suppress the LC brain cells' enhanced activeness, however, the neurons release excessive amounts of NA, triggering jitters, feet, muscle cramps, and diarrhea.
The Neurobiological Footing of Dependence and Withdrawal
The locus ceruleus (LC) is an area of the brain that is critically involved in the production of opioid dependence and withdrawal. The diagrams show how opioid drugs affect processes in the LC that control the release of noradrenaline (NA), a brain chemical that stimulates wakefulness, musculus tone, and respiration, amid other functions.
A. Ordinarily, natural opiatelike chemicals produced by the body link to mu opioid receptors on the surface of neurons. This linkage activates an enzyme that converts a chemic chosen adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into another chemical, chosen circadian adenosine monophosphate (camp), which in turn triggers the release of NA. Prior to initiation of opioid drug corruption, the neuron produces plenty NA to maintain normal levels of alertness, musculus tone, respiration, etc.
B. When heroin or another opioid drug links to the mu opioid receptors, it inhibits the enzyme that converts ATP to cAMP. As a result, less cAMP is produced, less NA is released. Alacrity, muscle tone, and respiration drib, and the acute opioid effects of sedation, shallow animate, etc., appear.
C. With repeated heroin exposure, the neuron increases its supply of enzyme and ATP molecules. Using these extra raw materials, the neuron can produce plenty military camp to offset the inhibitory effect of the drug and release roughly normal amounts of NA despite the presence of the drug. At this stage, the individual no longer experiences the same intensity of astute opioid effects as in earlier stages of abuse.
D. When heroin is discontinued after chronic abuse, the drug'southward inhibitory impact is lost. Operating at normal efficiency only with enhanced supplies of converting enzyme and ATP, the neuron produces abnormally high levels of campsite, leading to excessive release of NA. The patient experiences the clinical symptoms of withdrawal—jitters, anxiety, muscle cramps, etc. If no further drugs are taken, the neuron volition largely revert to its predrug condition (panel A) within days or weeks.
Other encephalon areas in addition to the LC also contribute to the production of withdrawal symptoms, including the mesolimbic reward system. For example, opioid tolerance that reduces the VTA's release of DA into the NAc may prevent the patient from obtaining pleasure from normally rewarding activities such as eating. These changes in the VTA and the DA advantage systems, though not fully understood, form an of import brain system underlying peckish and compulsive drug apply.
TRANSITION TO ADDICTION
As nosotros accept seen, the pleasance derived from opioids' activation of the encephalon'due south natural reward organisation promotes continued drug use during the initial stages of opioid addiction. Subsequently, repeated exposure to opioid drugs induces the brain mechanisms of dependence, which leads to daily drug use to avert the unpleasant symptoms of drug withdrawal. Further prolonged utilize produces more long-lasting changes in the brain that may underlie the compulsive drug-seeking beliefs and related adverse consequences that are the hallmarks of addiction. Recent scientific research has generated several models to explain how habitual drug use produces changes in the brain that may lead to drug habit. In reality, the process of addiction probably involves components from each of these models, as well as other features.
The "Changed Set Point" Model
The "changed set signal" model of drug habit has several variants based on the contradistinct neurobiology of the DA neurons in the VTA and of the NA neurons of the LC during the early phases of withdrawal and abstinence. The basic idea is that drug abuse alters a biological or physiological setting or baseline. 1 variant, by Koob and LeMoal (2001), is based on the idea that neurons of the mesolimbic reward pathways are naturally "ready" to release enough DA in the NAc to produce a normal level of pleasure. Koob and LeMoal suggest that opioids cause habit by initiating a vicious bicycle of changing this set point such that the release of DA is reduced when normally pleasurable activities occur and opioids are not present. Similarly, a change in prepare signal occurs in the LC, merely in the contrary management, such that NA release is increased during withdrawal, as described above. Under this model, both the positive (drug liking) and negative (drug withdrawal) aspects of drug addiction are deemed for.
A specific way that the DA neurons can become dysfunctional relates to an alteration in their baseline ("resting") levels of electric activeness and DA release (Grace, 2000). In this second variant of the changed set bespeak model, this resting level is the outcome of ii factors that influence the amount of resting DA release in the NAc: cortical excitatory (glutamate) neurons that drive the VTA DA neurons to release DA, and autoreceptors ("brakes") that close down further release when DA concentrations become excessive. Activation of opioid receptors by heroin and heroin-like drugs initially bypasses these brakes and leads to a big release of DA in the NAc. However, with repeated heroin use, the encephalon responds to these successive big DA releases by increasing the number and strength of the brakes on the VTA DA neurons. Somewhen, these enhanced "braking" autoreceptors inhibit the neurons' resting DA release. When this happens, the dependent addict will take even more heroin to offset the reduction of normal resting DA release. When he or she stops the heroin use, a state of DA deprivation will result, manifesting in dysphoria (pain, agitation, malaise) and other withdrawal symptoms, which can lead to a cycle of relapse to drug use.
A third variation on the fix-point change emphasizes the sensitivity to environmental cues that leads to drug wanting or craving rather than but reinforcement and withdrawal (Breiter et al., 1997; Robinson and Berridge, 2000). During periods when the drug is not available to addicts, their brains can remember the drug, and want or craving for the drug can be a major factor leading to drug use relapse. This craving may represent increased action of the cortical excitatory (glutamate) neurotransmitters, which drive the resting activity of the DA-containing VTA neurons, as mentioned, and likewise drive the LC NA neurons. As the glutamate activity increases, DA will be released from the VTA, leading to drug wanting or craving, and NA volition be released from the LC, leading to increased opioid withdrawal symptoms. This theory suggests that these cortical excitatory brain pathways are overactive in heroin habit and that reducing their activity would be therapeutic. Scientists are currently researching a medication called lamotrigene and related compounds called excitatory amino acid antagonists to come across whether this potential treatment strategy really can work.
Thus, several mechanisms in the LC and VTA-NAc brain pathways may be operating during addiction and relapse. The excitatory cortical pathways may produce little response in the VTA during the resting state, leading to reductions in DA. However, when the addicted private is exposed to cues that produce peckish, the glutamate pathways may get sufficiently agile to raise DA and stimulate desire for a greater high. This same increase in glutamate action will raise NA release from the LC to produce a dysphoric state predisposing to relapse and connected addiction.
Cognitive Deficits Model
The cognitive deficits model of drug habit proposes that individuals who develop addictive disorders have abnormalities in an surface area of the brain called the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The PFC is important for regulation of judgment, planning, and other executive functions. To help us overcome some of our impulses for firsthand gratification in favor of more of import or ultimately more rewarding long-term goals, the PFC sends inhibitory signals to the VTA DA neurons of the mesolimbic reward organisation.
The cerebral deficits model proposes that PFC signaling to the mesolimbic reward system is compromised in individuals with addictive disorders, and as a upshot they take reduced ability to utilize judgment to restrain their impulses and are predisposed to compulsive drug-taking behaviors. Consistent with this model, stimulant drugs such as methamphetamine appear to impairment the specific brain circuit—the frontostriatal loop—that carries inhibitory signals from the PFC to the mesolimbic advantage organization. In addition, a recent study using magnetic resonance spectroscopy showed that chronic alcohol abusers have abnormally depression levels of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), the neurochemical that the PFC uses to betoken the reward system to release less DA (Behar et al., 1999). Equally well, the cognitive deficits model of drug addiction could explain the clinical ascertainment that heroin addiction is more astringent in individuals with antisocial personality disorder—a condition that is independently associated with PFC deficits (Raine et al., 2000).
In contrast to stimulants, heroin obviously dam-ages the PFC but not the frontostriatal loop. Therefore, individuals who become heroin addicts may have some PFC damage that is independent of their opioid abuse, either inherited genetically or acquired past some other factor or result in their lives. This preexisting PFC impairment predisposes these individuals to impulsivity and lack of control, and the additional PFC damage from chronic repeated heroin abuse increases the severity of these problems (Kosten, 1998).
STRESS AND DRUG CRAVING
That drug abuse patients are more vulnerable to stress than the general population is a clinical truism. In the research arena, numerous studies have documented that concrete stressors (such equally footshock or restraint stress) and psychological stressors tin can cause animals to reinstate drug apply and that stressors can trigger drug craving in fond humans (due east.thou., Shaham et al., 2000). The likely explanation for these observations is that opioids raise levels of cortisol, a hormone that plays a primary role in stress responses; and cortisol, in plough, raises the level of activeness in the mesolimbic reward system (Kreek and Koob, 1998). By these mechanisms, stress may contribute to the abuser'south desire to take drugs in the first identify and to his or her subsequent compulsion to keep taking them.
PHARMACOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS AND TREATMENT IMPLICATIONS
In summary, the various biological models of drug addiction are complementary and broadly applicable to chemical addictions. Long-term pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence and addiction annul or reverse the abnormalities underlying those weather condition, thereby enhancing programs of psychological rehabilitation. Short-term treatments for relieving withdrawal symptoms and increasing abstinence are across the scope of this article; instead, we refer readers elsewhere for detailed neurobiological explanations of the diverse nonopioid-based forbearance initiation approaches such as clonidine and clonidine-naltrex-one for rapid detoxification (encounter O'Connor and Kosten, 1998, and O'Connor et al., 1997).
The medications most commonly used to treat opioid abuse attach to the brain cells' mu opioid receptors, like the addictive opioids themselves. Methadone and LAAM stimulate the cells much as the illicit opioids exercise, but they take unlike effects because of their different durations of activity. Naltrexone and buprenorphine stimulate the cells in means quite singled-out from the addictive opioids. Each medication can play a role in comprehensive treatment for opioid addiction.
Methadone
Methadone is a long-acting opioid medication. Unlike morphine, heroin, oxycodone, and other addictive opioids that remain in the encephalon and body for merely a short time, methadone has effects that final for days. Methadone causes dependence, simply—considering of its steadier influence on the mu opioid receptors—it produces minimal tolerance and alleviates craving and compulsive drug utilise. In add-on, methadone therapy tends to normalize many aspects of the hormonal disruptions plant in fond individuals (Kling et al., 2000; Kreek, 2000; Schluger et al., 2001). For case, it moderates the exaggerated cortisol stress response (discussed above) that increases the danger of relapse in stressful situations.
Methadone treatment reduces relapse rates, facilitates behavioral therapy, and enables patients to concentrate on life tasks such as maintaining relationships and holding jobs. Pioneering studies by Dole, Nyswander, and Kreek in 1964 to 1966 established methadone's efficacy (Dole et al., 1966). As a Drug Enforcement Assistants schedule II controlled substance, the medication is administered primarily in federally regulated methadone programs, where careful monitoring of patients' urine and regular drug counseling are critical components of rehabilitation. Patients are generally started on a daily dose of twenty mg to thirty mg, with increases of five mg to x mg until a dose of 60 mg to 100 mg per twenty-four hour period is achieved. The higher doses produce full suppression of opioid peckish and, consequently, opioid-gratis urine tests (Judd et al., 1998). Patients generally stay on methadone for 6 months to iii years, some much longer. Relapse is common among patients who discontinue methadone after only 2 years or less, and many patients accept benefited from lifelong methadone maintenance.
LAAM
A longer interim derivative of methadone, LAAM can be given three times per week. Recent concerns almost middle rhythm bug (specifically, prolonged QT interval) have express LAAM'due south use (U.S. Nutrient and Drug Administration, 2001). However, long-term maintenance on moderate to high doses of LAAM tin can, like methadone maintenance, normalize physiological functions such equally the cortisol stress response (Kling et al., 2000; Kreek, 1992, 2000; Schluger et al., 2001). Dosing with LAAM is highly individualized, and three-times-weekly doses range from twoscore mg to 140 mg.
Naltrexone
Naltrexone is used to help patients avoid relapse later on they have been detoxified from opioid dependence. Its principal therapeutic activity is to monopolize mu opioid receptors in the encephalon so that addictive opioids cannot link up with them and stimulate the brain'southward advantage system. Naltrexone clings to the mu opioid receptors 100 times more strongly than opioids practise, only it does not promote the encephalon processes that produce feelings of pleasure (Kosten and Kleber, 1984). An individual who is adequately dosed with naltrex-one does not obtain any pleasure from addictive opioids and is less motivated to use them.
Before naltrexone treatment is started, patients must be fully detoxified from all opioids, including methadone and other treatment medications; otherwise, they will be at gamble for severe withdrawal. Naltrexone is given at 50 mg per twenty-four hours or up to 200 mg twice weekly. Patients' liver part should be tested before treatment starts, as heroin abusers may have experienced summit of certain liver enzymes (transaminases) caused past infectious complications of intravenous drug use, such as hepatitis (Verebey and Mule, 1986).
Unfortunately, medication compliance is a critical problem with naltrexone, because unlike methadone or LAAM, naltrexone does not itself produce pleasurable feelings. Poor compliance limits naltrexone'southward utility to simply about 15 percent of heroin addicts (Kosten and Kleber, 1984).
Naltrexone is also sometimes used to rapidly detoxify patients from opioid dependence. In this situation, while naltrexone keeps the addictive opioid molecules away from the mu opioid receptors, clonidine may help to suppress the excessive NA output that is a primary cause of withdrawal (Kosten, 1990).
Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine'south activeness on the mu opioid receptors elicits 2 dissimilar therapeutic responses within the brain cells, depending on the dose. At low doses buprenorphine has effects like methadone, just at loftier doses it behaves like naltrexone, blocking the receptors so strongly that it can precipitate withdrawal in highly dependent patients (that is, those maintained on more than 40 mg methadone daily).
Buprenorphine is expected to be approved past the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of opioid dependence in 2002. Several clinical trials have shown that when used in a comprehensive handling program with psychotherapy, buprenorphine is equally effective as methadone, except for patients with heroin addiction and so severe they would require a dose of more than than 100 mg daily (Kosten et al., 1993; Oliveto et al., 1999; Schottenfeld et al., 1997). Buprenorphine offers a safe advantage over methadone and LAAM, since high doses precipitate withdrawal rather than the suppression of consciousness and respiration seen in overdoses of methadone, LAAM, and the addictive opioids. Buprenorphine tin can be given three times per week. Because of its prophylactic and convenient dosing, information technology may be useful for treating opioid addiction in primary care settings, which is especially helpful since virtually opioid addicts have significant medical bug (for example, hepatitis B or C and HIV infection). Buprenorphine will be available in 4 mg and eight mg tablets. A combination tablet with naloxone (Suboxone) has been developed to negate the reward a user would feel if he or she were to illegally divert and inject the medication. The maintenance dose of the combination tablet can be upwardly to 24 mg and used for every-other-24-hour interval dosing.
Equally office-based treatment of heroin addiction becomes bachelor, the highest possible prophylactic level (that is, minimal side effects) should be balanced with treatment effectiveness. The patient taking methadone must either visit the medical function daily (not feasible in virtually cases) or be responsible for taking daily doses at home, as scheduled. Appropriately, for an opioid-dependent patient who cannot exist relied upon to take the medication equally instructed and thus might overdose, buprenorphine in iii doses weekly would be a safer choice than methadone. The patient's office visits could be limited to in one case or twice per week, with remaining buprenorphine doses taken at habitation. Also, buprenorphine has less overdose potential than methadone, since information technology blocks other opioids and even itself as the dosage increases.
SUMMARY
Opioid dependence and addiction are near appropriately understood as chronic medical disorders, like hypertension, schizophrenia, and diabetes. Every bit with those other diseases, a cure for drug addiction is unlikely, and frequent recurrences can be expected; but long-term treatment can limit the disease'south adverse effects and amend the patient's day-to-twenty-four hours functioning.
The mesolimbic reward system appears to be central to the development of the straight clinical consequences of chronic opioid abuse, including tolerance, dependence, and addiction. Other brain areas and neurochemicals, including cortisol, besides are relevant to dependence and relapse. Pharmacological interventions for opioid addiction are highly effective; however, given the complex biological, psychological, and social aspects of the disease, they must be accompanied by appropriate psychosocial treatments. Clinician awareness of the neurobiological basis of opioid dependence, and information-sharing with patients, tin provide insight into patient behaviors and problems and clarify the rationale for treatment methods and goals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by NIDA grants number P50-DA-1-2762, K05-DA-0-0454, K12-DA-0-0167, R01-DA-ane-3672, and R01-DA-1-4039.
REFERENCES
- Behar KL, et al. Preliminary show of low cortical GABA levels in localized 1H-MR spectra of alcohol-dependent and hepatic encephalopathy patients. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(6):952–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breiter HC, et al. Acute furnishings of cocaine on human being brain activity and emotion. Neuron. 1997;xix(3):591–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dole VP, Nyswander ME, Kreek MJ. Narcotic occludent. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1966;118(4):304–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grace AA. The tonic/phasic model of dopamine system regulation and its implications for understanding alcohol and stimulant craving. Habit. 2000;95(Suppl 2):S119–S128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Judd LL, et al. Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction. Periodical of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(22):1936–1943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kling MA, et al. Opioid receptor imaging with PET and [18F] cyclofoxy in long-term, methadone-treated sometime heroin addicts. Journal of Pharmacological and Experimental Therapeutics. 2000;295(three):1070–1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koob GF, LeMoal M. Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(2):97–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosten TR. Neurobiology of abused drugs: Opioids and stimulants. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1990;178(four):217–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosten TR. Pharmacotherapy of cerebral ischemia in cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;49(two):133–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosten TR, Kleber Hd. Strategies to improve compliance with narcotic antagonists. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1984;x(2):249–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosten TR, Schottenfeld RS, Ziedonis D, Falcioni J. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1993;181(six):358–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreek MJ. Rationale for maintenance pharmacotherapy of opiate dependence. In: O'Brien CP, Jaffe JH, editors. Addictive States. New York: Raven Press; 1992. pp. 205–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kreek MJ. Methadone-related opioid agonist pharmacotherapy for heroin habit: History, recent molecular and neurochemical research and the future in mainstream medicine. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences. 2000;909:186–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kreek MJ, Koob GF. Drug dependence: Stress and dysregulation of brain reward pathways. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1998;51(1–2):23–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connor PG, Kosten TR. Rapid and ultrarapid opioid detoxification techniques. Journal of the American Medical Clan. 1998;279(3):229–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connor PG, et al. Three methods of opioid detoxification in a primary intendance setting: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997;127(7):526–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliveto AH, et al. Desipramine in opioid-dependent cocaine abusers maintained on buprenorphine versus methadone. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;56(9):812–820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raine A, et al. Reduced prefrontal grayness affair volume and reduced autonomic action in antisocial personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2000;57(2):119–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The psychology and neurobiology of habit: An incentive-sensitization view. Habit. 2000;95(Suppl 2):S91–S117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schluger JH, Borg 50, Ho A, Kreek MJ. Altered HPA centrality responsivity to metyrapone testing in methadone maintained quondam heroin addicts with ongoing cocaine addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(5):568–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schottenfeld RS, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse. Athenaeum of General Psychiatry. 1997;54(8):713–720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaham Y, Erb S, Stewart J. Stress-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking in rats: A review. Encephalon Inquiry Reviews. 2000;33(1):13–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- U.South. Nutrient and Drug Administration. FDA Talk Paper: FDA Announces Labeling Changes Following Cardiac Adverse Events With Addiction Drug. 2001. April 20, 2001. [ www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2001/ANS01076.html]
- Verebey KG, Mule SJ. Naltrexone (Trexan): A review of hepatotoxicity bug. In: Harris LS, editor. Bug of Drug Dependence, 1985: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Scientific Meeting, the Committee on Bug of Drug Dependence, Inc; Washington, DC: U.Southward. Government Printing Office; 1986. pp. 73–81. NIDA Research Monograph 67. DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 86–1448. [Google Scholar]
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2851054/
0 Response to "Never Enjoy Life Again After Opiate Addiction"
Postar um comentário